Showing posts with label After. Show all posts
Showing posts with label After. Show all posts

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Airline ticket refunds up after bin Laden death, firm says

Saturday, May 7, 2011
0 comments


Comments  7

By Ben Mutzabaugh, USA TODAY


- UPDATED: 1:50 p.m. ET

Refunds for airline tickets sold by U.S. travel agents, including online travel websites, increased in the days after Osama Bin Laden's death, says a company that facilitates transactions and provides data information for U.S. airlines.

Virginia-based Airlines Reporting Corporation (ARC) says in a release:

Initial data revealed ticket refunds increased to 33,518 on Monday, May 2, and Tuesday, May 3, compared to 24,146 on Monday, April 25, and Tuesday, April 26, the week before. Refunds processed on May 2 and 3 represent 2.6% of the 1.3 million outstanding air tickets during this period, versus 1.9% of the 1.2 million outstanding tickets during April 25 and 26.

I asked the ARC to follow-up on its findings, and here's what the firm had to say:

"We had received some industry queries about any changes or refunds after bin Laden's death. We looked at the data and saw a bump in refunds on Monday and Tuesday, although the data since is saying that things have settled down to the normal level we see daily," ARC spokesman Peter Abzug says in en e-mail to Today the Sky.

He adds:

We are in no way saying that this is directly related to the bin Laden event; we were only trying to provide a snapshot based on travel agency transactions (both brick and mortar and online.) For whatever reason, the bump was short lived and we can't positively say what it was from...there just seemed to be some interest in the information and that is why it was release. By the way, as it indicated in the release, the refunds to outstanding tickets represent a very small percentage...so there was definitely no panic.


Posted May 6 2011 9:53AM




Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Hud Settlement Statement

View the original article here


read more

After 50 years of decline, household size is growing

0 comments








A half-century slide in the number of people living under one roof has ended and has even reversed in some places, according to 2010 Census data released today.





  • More people are living under one roof, according to new Census data.

    File photo by Gene J. Puskar, AP


    More people are living under one roof, according to new Census data.



File photo by Gene J. Puskar, AP


More people are living under one roof, according to new Census data.






Average household size is inching up in Florida (2.48 persons per household vs. 2.46 in 2000) and has stopped declining in Tennessee (2.48), according to the first wave of detailed data on 12 states and the District of Columbia.


The change was most dramatic for renters: The average household size in rentals rose or stayed flat in 11 of the states from 2000 to 2010. The biggest increases are in Florida and Tennessee.


Just as growing affluence let many Americans live with fewer people, the recession, high unemployment and the housing bust now are forcing some people to double up.


A family that lost its home to foreclosure may either rent or live with friends or relatives.


"The economy played a large role," says Zhenchao Qian, sociology professor at Ohio State University who is doing research for the US 2010 Census Project, which studies trends in American society.


That's why an increasing number of young adults are living with their parents including "boomerang kids" who return after college. The percentage of young adults ages 19 to 29 who are living with their parents rose from 25% in 1980 to 34% in the late 2000s, Qian's research shows.


"Young adults have poor job prospects when the economy is bad," he says.




There is less of a rush to the altar as a result, which cuts the creation of households a factor for planners and home builders.


The rapid growth in immigrants also affects household size, says William Frey, demographer at the Brookings Institution. Many embrace living with in-laws and family even after they marry, and others are forced into those arrangements because of cost.


Other highlights from the Census data:


•Getting older. The median age (half older, half younger) in Maine is 42.7 the highest of any state released so far. All the states showed declines in the number of people ages 35 to 44 and gains among those ages 45 to 74, Frey's analysis shows.


The oldest of 77 million Baby Boomers turn 65 this year and that generation is driving the aging in most states, says Kenneth Johnson, demographer at the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire.


The share of people older than 65 in Florida actually dropped even though the median age rose from 38.7 to 40.7.


"We really are seeing the lull before the storm of the Baby Boom,'' Johnson says.


•Fewer traditional households. All 12 states and the District of Columbia showed drops in the share of married-with-children families. The number of married couples who have no children rose in every state, in part because millions of Baby Boomers became empty nesters.


"Overall, it's clear that non-family households are gaining more than family households, and households without children are growing faster than those with children,'' Frey says.





Posted | Updated












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Hud Settlement Statement

View the original article here


read more

Analysis: Reimagining Obama after gutsy raid

0 comments








WASHINGTON (AP) ? It was just a firehouse chat with the guys of Engine 54 in lower Manhattan. But President Barack Obama delivered a message he hopes will also hit home with every American in this week of national catharsis: "You're always going to have a president and an administration who's got your back."





  • President Barack Obama addresses military personnel who have recently returned from Afghanistan on Friday at Fort Campbell, Ky.

    By Charles Dharapak, AP


    President Barack Obama addresses military personnel who have recently returned from Afghanistan on Friday at Fort Campbell, Ky.



By Charles Dharapak, AP


President Barack Obama addresses military personnel who have recently returned from Afghanistan on Friday at Fort Campbell, Ky.






In the denouement to the daring raid that brought down Osama bin Laden, the president has in effect been reintroduced to the nation.


While taking care to strike the right tone — trying to savor the success of the dramatic covert operation without appearing to gloat — Obama has offered himself as a decisive leader willing to take bold risks.


He's gotten a bump in the polls that isn't likely to last. But Americans may well come away with altered perceptions of a president whose strongest personal qualities in past polls have run to squishier traits like being a good communicator and friendly.


"It sheds a new light on him," says pollster Andrew Kohut, president of the Pew Research Center. "What happened here may improve impressions that he is a strong and forceful leader, and that's the enduring potential benefit."


Obama's understated victory lap — not that he would ever call it that — continued on Friday in Kentucky, where he met privately at Fort Campbell with participants in the assault on bin Laden's Pakistani hideaway and in public with U.S. troops returning from Afghanistan. "Job well done," the president declared.


The president has been careful to shower credit and praise for the successful raid on the U.S. military and the nation's intelligence and counterterrorism apparatus, and to frame this as a time for Americans to set aside politics and conjure the unity that the nation felt after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.


But it is inescapable that he is not only a president. He also is a candidate for re-election. And the successful raid can only do him good politically.


Contrast the competing images of Obama at New York's ground zero on Thursday, meeting with first responders and families of those lost in the terror attacks, with those from Greenville, S.C., where the first debate of GOP presidential contenders played out Thursday night. The event attracted a field of relative unknowns lacking in foreign policy experience.


For now, even Obama's political opponents are willing to give him his due.


Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a GOP presidential hopeful who declined to participate in the South Carolina debate, gave no-strings-attached credit to the president, the military and the intelligence community earlier in the week, calling it "a great victory for lovers of freedom and justice everywhere."


Former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has never shied from criticism of the Obama administration, also offered up credit to the president and his national security team. But he coupled it with a reminder that each president has built upon the work of his predecessor.


"We picked up on items that had been collected during the Clinton administration and worked those aggressively for eight years," Cheney said in a TV interview after the raid. "We passed that on to the Obama administration. They picked it up and they've been working it."


Fair or not, though, the credit for a blockbuster achievement like the demise of bin Laden goes to the sitting president.


With all that could have gone wrong, the risky mission could well have ended in unmitigated disaster. And, in that case, it would have been blame that was assigned to the sitting president.


Former President Jimmy Carter knows about that.


In 1980, Carter approved a plan to rescue the American hostages in Iran that ended in failure and left eight American servicemen dead. The botched mission was cited as one factor in Carter's defeat when he ran for re-election.


In an interview with CNN, Carter recalled the failed rescue as a heartbreaking event and expressed hope that Obama would benefit from the successful hunt for bin Laden.


"I believe this has substantially enhanced his political standing — his reputation among people, particularly those that didn't think he was a strong, competent person who could carry out a mission successfully," the former president said.


Carter's comments hinted at the president's political vulnerability on questions of leadership.


In a January survey by Pew, Obama got his highest marks for personal traits such as good communicator (75 percent), warm and friendly (70 percent), and "stands up for what he believes in" (77 percent). By contrast, 54 percent of those surveyed saw him as "able to get things done" and 53 percent viewed him as a "strong leader."


Polls also show that Obama's personal approval ratings have suffered amid public impatience with the ongoing wars and dissatisfaction with the state of the economy.


Just a day before the bin Laden raid, Obama joked that his dismal poll numbers gave him "a really great self-help tool" for overcoming arrogance.


Early in his presidency, George W. Bush found his voice in the rubble of the twin towers at the World Trade Center, when he spoke to workers there through a bullhorn just days after the attacks and told them: "I can hear you! The rest of the world hears you! And the people — the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon!"


Bush's approval ratings soared after 9/11. But as time passed, and the nation became bogged down in two unpopular wars, that support evaporated.


Well into his presidency, Obama is being re-evaluated in light of the bin Laden raid and his measured handling of what his spokesman calls "this significant and cathartic moment" for the nation.


The president talks of demonstrating to the world "who we are" by the way the U.S. has managed the raid and its aftermath.


Privately, Obama has to hope that people will come away with a better sense of who he is, too.


Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




Posted | Updated












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Hud Settlement Statement

View the original article here


read more

After 50 years of decline, household size is growing

0 comments








A half-century slide in the number of people living under one roof has ended and has even reversed in some places, according to 2010 Census data released today.





  • More people are living under one roof, according to new Census data.

    File photo by Gene J. Puskar, AP


    More people are living under one roof, according to new Census data.



File photo by Gene J. Puskar, AP


More people are living under one roof, according to new Census data.






Average household size is inching up in Florida (2.48 persons per household vs. 2.46 in 2000) and has stopped declining in Tennessee (2.48), according to the first wave of detailed data on 12 states and the District of Columbia.


The change was most dramatic for renters: The average household size in rentals rose or stayed flat in 11 of the states from 2000 to 2010. The biggest increases are in Florida and Tennessee.


Just as growing affluence let many Americans live with fewer people, the recession, high unemployment and the housing bust now are forcing some people to double up.


A family that lost its home to foreclosure may either rent or live with friends or relatives.


"The economy played a large role," says Zhenchao Qian, sociology professor at Ohio State University who is doing research for the US 2010 Census Project, which studies trends in American society.


That's why an increasing number of young adults are living with their parents including "boomerang kids" who return after college. The percentage of young adults ages 19 to 29 who are living with their parents rose from 25% in 1980 to 34% in the late 2000s, Qian's research shows.


"Young adults have poor job prospects when the economy is bad," he says.




There is less of a rush to the altar as a result, which cuts the creation of households a factor for planners and home builders.


The rapid growth in immigrants also affects household size, says William Frey, demographer at the Brookings Institution. Many embrace living with in-laws and family even after they marry, and others are forced into those arrangements because of cost.


Other highlights from the Census data:


•Getting older. The median age (half older, half younger) in Maine is 42.7 the highest of any state released so far. All the states showed declines in the number of people ages 35 to 44 and gains among those ages 45 to 74, Frey's analysis shows.


The oldest of 77 million Baby Boomers turn 65 this year and that generation is driving the aging in most states, says Kenneth Johnson, demographer at the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire.


The share of people older than 65 in Florida actually dropped even though the median age rose from 38.7 to 40.7.


"We really are seeing the lull before the storm of the Baby Boom,'' Johnson says.


•Fewer traditional households. All 12 states and the District of Columbia showed drops in the share of married-with-children families. The number of married couples who have no children rose in every state, in part because millions of Baby Boomers became empty nesters.


"Overall, it's clear that non-family households are gaining more than family households, and households without children are growing faster than those with children,'' Frey says.





Posted | Updated












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Hud Settlement Statement

View the original article here


read more

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

After 50 years of decline, household size is growing

Wednesday, May 4, 2011
0 comments








A half-century slide in the number of people living under one roof has ended and has even reversed in some places, according to 2010 Census data released today.





  • More people are living under one roof, according to new Census data.

    File photo by Gene J. Puskar, AP


    More people are living under one roof, according to new Census data.



File photo by Gene J. Puskar, AP


More people are living under one roof, according to new Census data.






Average household size is inching up in Florida (2.48 persons per household vs. 2.46 in 2000) and has stopped declining in Tennessee (2.48), according to the first wave of detailed data on 12 states and the District of Columbia.


The change was most dramatic for renters: The average household size in rentals rose or stayed flat in 11 of the states from 2000 to 2010. The biggest increases are in Florida and Tennessee.


Just as growing affluence let many Americans live with fewer people, the recession, high unemployment and the housing bust now are forcing some people to double up.


A family that lost its home to foreclosure may either rent or live with friends or relatives.


"The economy played a large role," says Zhenchao Qian, sociology professor at Ohio State University who is doing research for the US 2010 Census Project, which studies trends in American society.




That's why an increasing number of young adults are living with their parents including "boomerang kids" who return after college. The percentage of young adults ages 19 to 29 who are living with their parents rose from 25% in 1980 to 34% in the late 2000s, Qian's research shows.


"Young adults have poor job prospects when the economy is bad," he says.


There is less of a rush to the altar as a result, which cuts the creation of households a factor for planners and home builders.


The rapid growth in immigrants also affects household size, says William Frey, demographer at the Brookings Institution. Many embrace living with in-laws and family even after they marry, and others are forced into those arrangements because of cost.


Other highlights from the Census data:


•Getting older. The median age (half older, half younger) in Maine is 42.7 the highest of any state released so far. All the states showed declines in the number of people ages 35 to 44 and gains among those ages 45 to 74, Frey's analysis shows.


The oldest of 77 million Baby Boomers turn 65 this year and that generation is driving the aging in most states, says Kenneth Johnson, demographer at the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire.


The share of people older than 65 in Florida actually dropped even though the median age rose from 38.7 to 40.7.


"We really are seeing the lull before the storm of the Baby Boom,'' Johnson says.


•Fewer traditional households. All 12 states and the District of Columbia showed drops in the share of married-with-children families. The number of married couples who have no children rose in every state, in part because millions of Baby Boomers became empty nesters.


"Overall, it's clear that non-family households are gaining more than family households, and households without children are growing faster than those with children,'' Frey says.





Posted | Updated












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Hud Settlement Statement

read more