Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Analysis: Reimagining Obama after gutsy raid

Saturday, May 7, 2011
0 comments








WASHINGTON (AP) ? It was just a firehouse chat with the guys of Engine 54 in lower Manhattan. But President Barack Obama delivered a message he hopes will also hit home with every American in this week of national catharsis: "You're always going to have a president and an administration who's got your back."





  • President Barack Obama addresses military personnel who have recently returned from Afghanistan on Friday at Fort Campbell, Ky.

    By Charles Dharapak, AP


    President Barack Obama addresses military personnel who have recently returned from Afghanistan on Friday at Fort Campbell, Ky.



By Charles Dharapak, AP


President Barack Obama addresses military personnel who have recently returned from Afghanistan on Friday at Fort Campbell, Ky.






In the denouement to the daring raid that brought down Osama bin Laden, the president has in effect been reintroduced to the nation.


While taking care to strike the right tone — trying to savor the success of the dramatic covert operation without appearing to gloat — Obama has offered himself as a decisive leader willing to take bold risks.


He's gotten a bump in the polls that isn't likely to last. But Americans may well come away with altered perceptions of a president whose strongest personal qualities in past polls have run to squishier traits like being a good communicator and friendly.


"It sheds a new light on him," says pollster Andrew Kohut, president of the Pew Research Center. "What happened here may improve impressions that he is a strong and forceful leader, and that's the enduring potential benefit."


Obama's understated victory lap — not that he would ever call it that — continued on Friday in Kentucky, where he met privately at Fort Campbell with participants in the assault on bin Laden's Pakistani hideaway and in public with U.S. troops returning from Afghanistan. "Job well done," the president declared.


The president has been careful to shower credit and praise for the successful raid on the U.S. military and the nation's intelligence and counterterrorism apparatus, and to frame this as a time for Americans to set aside politics and conjure the unity that the nation felt after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.


But it is inescapable that he is not only a president. He also is a candidate for re-election. And the successful raid can only do him good politically.


Contrast the competing images of Obama at New York's ground zero on Thursday, meeting with first responders and families of those lost in the terror attacks, with those from Greenville, S.C., where the first debate of GOP presidential contenders played out Thursday night. The event attracted a field of relative unknowns lacking in foreign policy experience.


For now, even Obama's political opponents are willing to give him his due.


Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a GOP presidential hopeful who declined to participate in the South Carolina debate, gave no-strings-attached credit to the president, the military and the intelligence community earlier in the week, calling it "a great victory for lovers of freedom and justice everywhere."


Former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has never shied from criticism of the Obama administration, also offered up credit to the president and his national security team. But he coupled it with a reminder that each president has built upon the work of his predecessor.


"We picked up on items that had been collected during the Clinton administration and worked those aggressively for eight years," Cheney said in a TV interview after the raid. "We passed that on to the Obama administration. They picked it up and they've been working it."


Fair or not, though, the credit for a blockbuster achievement like the demise of bin Laden goes to the sitting president.


With all that could have gone wrong, the risky mission could well have ended in unmitigated disaster. And, in that case, it would have been blame that was assigned to the sitting president.


Former President Jimmy Carter knows about that.


In 1980, Carter approved a plan to rescue the American hostages in Iran that ended in failure and left eight American servicemen dead. The botched mission was cited as one factor in Carter's defeat when he ran for re-election.


In an interview with CNN, Carter recalled the failed rescue as a heartbreaking event and expressed hope that Obama would benefit from the successful hunt for bin Laden.


"I believe this has substantially enhanced his political standing — his reputation among people, particularly those that didn't think he was a strong, competent person who could carry out a mission successfully," the former president said.


Carter's comments hinted at the president's political vulnerability on questions of leadership.


In a January survey by Pew, Obama got his highest marks for personal traits such as good communicator (75 percent), warm and friendly (70 percent), and "stands up for what he believes in" (77 percent). By contrast, 54 percent of those surveyed saw him as "able to get things done" and 53 percent viewed him as a "strong leader."


Polls also show that Obama's personal approval ratings have suffered amid public impatience with the ongoing wars and dissatisfaction with the state of the economy.


Just a day before the bin Laden raid, Obama joked that his dismal poll numbers gave him "a really great self-help tool" for overcoming arrogance.


Early in his presidency, George W. Bush found his voice in the rubble of the twin towers at the World Trade Center, when he spoke to workers there through a bullhorn just days after the attacks and told them: "I can hear you! The rest of the world hears you! And the people — the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon!"


Bush's approval ratings soared after 9/11. But as time passed, and the nation became bogged down in two unpopular wars, that support evaporated.


Well into his presidency, Obama is being re-evaluated in light of the bin Laden raid and his measured handling of what his spokesman calls "this significant and cathartic moment" for the nation.


The president talks of demonstrating to the world "who we are" by the way the U.S. has managed the raid and its aftermath.


Privately, Obama has to hope that people will come away with a better sense of who he is, too.


Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




Posted | Updated












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Hud Settlement Statement

View the original article here


read more

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Obama decides not to release 'graphic' bin Laden photos

Thursday, May 5, 2011
0 comments








WASHINGTON ? President Obama declared Wednesday that "you will not see bin Laden walking on this earth again" but said he would not release photos of the terrorist leader's corpse as proof that he is dead.





  • President Obama, speaking Wednesday at the White House, said of the photos,

    By Carolyn Kaster, AP


    President Obama, speaking Wednesday at the White House, said of the photos, "We don't trot out this stuff as trophies."



By Carolyn Kaster, AP


President Obama, speaking Wednesday at the White House, said of the photos, "We don't trot out this stuff as trophies."






"It is important for us to make sure that very graphic photos of somebody who was shot in the head are not floating around as an incitement to additional violence, as a propaganda tool," Obama told CBS' 60 Minutes in an interview to be broadcast Sunday. "You know, that's not who we are. You know, we don't trot out this stuff as trophies."


Obama's decision put an end to two days of speculation about whether the White House would release photos of the dead al-Qaeda leader or other images from the compound where he was shot on Monday or his subsequent burial at sea.


Although CIA Director Leon Panetta on Tuesday told NBC Nightly News that he didn't think there was any question that "ultimately a photograph would be presented to the public," White House press secretary Jay Carney said Obama "held this opinion very firmly."


The White House has said repeatedly that there is ample evidence that Osama bin Laden is dead: from photos, DNA sampling and facial recognition technology. "There are going to be some folks that deny it," said Obama, alluding to conspiracy theorists. But "there's no doubt that bin Laden is dead," he said. "So we don't think that a photograph in and of itself is going to make any difference."


Reaction to his decision was mostly positive. "If there was a serious doubt out there, if people were claiming he was still alive, that (would be) different," said former 9/11 Commission chairman Tom Kean, a Republican. "But it seems to me that everyone is in agreement that he's dead. So particularly if it's graphic, I don't see the necessity of it."


Carie Lemack, whose mother Judy Larocque died aboard American Airlines Flight 11 on 9/11, said, "There are people out there who are going to continue to demand proof, but I don't think that releasing the photos would give them the proof. I want to make sure nobody else dies because of this man."


Lemack plans to attend today's ceremony at Ground Zero in New York City, where Obama will lay a wreath at the site of the World Trade Center towers. Former president George W. Bush declined Obama's invitation to join him, citing a desire to stay out of the spotlight. Obama, who will not make public remarks, plans private meetings with relatives of 9/11 victims and first responders.


In Congress, the heads of the House and Senate intelligence committees also said they support keeping the images classified. "I don't think that the timing is such that something incendiary is the right thing to do." said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Senate committee. Said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., head of the House panel: "I don't want to make the job of our troops serving in places like Iraq and Afghanistan any harder than it already is."The risks of release outweigh the benefits. Conspiracy theorists around the world will just claim the photos are doctored anyway, and there is a real risk that releasing the photos will only serve to inflame public opinion in the Middle East. ... Imagine how the American people would react if al-Qaeda killed one of our troops or military leaders, and put photos of the body on the Internet. Osama bin Laden is not a trophy he is dead and let's now focus on continuing the fight until al-Qaeda has been eliminated."


But opinion was not unanimous. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., called Obama's decision "a mistake."


"The whole purpose of sending our soldiers into the compound, rather than an aerial bombardment, was to obtain indisputable proof of Bin Laden's death," Graham said. "I know bin Laden is dead. But the best way to protect and defend our interests overseas is to prove that fact to the rest of the world," he said.


Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin also disapproved. She tweeted: "Show photo as warning to others seeking America's destruction. No pussy-footing around, no politicking, no drama; it's part of the mission."


Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., had another idea: keep the images under seal for a period of time, maybe 10 years, and then make them available. "The free flow of information is not just a matter of good government, but a necessary part of our democracy," Nelson wrote in a letter to Obama.


Obama's decision to withhold the images came as the White House also stopped releasing details of the dramatic raid on bin Laden's compound. One day after officials corrected misstatements by counterterrorism czar John Brennan, who had said bin Laden had been armed and that his wife had been killed, Carney said no more details about the raid would be released because the methods used by the Navy SEALs in the operation are top-secret and that secrecy must be maintained for possible future raids.


"In terms of the operational details, we have gotten to the point where we cannot cross lines because of the necessity for preserving the methods and operational techniques and capabilities of the kinds of forces that were used in this case," he said. "We've gone to the limit of our ability to do that and still maintain some of the things we need to maintain and be kept secret."





Posted | Updated












Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Hud Settlement Statement

read more